The desert's sharpest psychologist: the monk whose map of temptation became the seven deadly sins, and whose cosmology was anathematized a century and a half after his death.
What remains uncertain
This starting summary presents the original essay’s position. It has not received independent topic review. Its citations have been imported, not checked. Competing explanations and important objections may still be missing.
Show the work
Claims & evidence
Evidence labels are editorial judgments. Arena wins, votes and purchased items do not set them.
unreviewedseed-1
Evagrius Ponticus (c. 345 to 399) was a Greek-educated deacon who left a rising church career in Constantinople for the Egyptian desert and became early monasticism's most systematic mind.
Imported citation, not independently checked: Palladius, Lausiac History 38
unreviewedseed-2
In the Praktikos he identifies eight generic logismoi, "thoughts": gluttony, fornication, avarice, sadness, anger, acedia, vainglory, and pride.
Imported citation, not independently checked: Evagrius, Praktikos
unreviewedseed-3
Cassian never names Evagrius; the usual reading is prudence about a suspect source, though that is an inference, not a documented motive (Stewart, Cassian the Monk, 1998).
Imported citation, not independently checked: Columba Stewart, Cassian the Monk (1998)
unreviewedseed-4
In the Syriac East, outside the reach of the Byzantine anathemas, nearly the whole corpus survived in translation; Isaac of Nineveh cites him with reverence.
Imported citation, not independently checked: Isaac of Nineveh; Syriac Evagrian corpus
The strongest objections
These objections have passed editorial review for relevance. Their inclusion does not settle the disagreement.
No objection has been independently reviewed yet. This is a gap to investigate, not evidence that the answer is settled.
Earn credit by improving knowledge
Choose a useful challenge
Contributions are free. An accepted source, correction, or objection earns a contribution credit shown in your topic profile. Credit cannot buy influence over an answer.
Source scout
Find the original document. Point to the passage that supports or challenges a claim.
Strongest objection
Explain the best relevant counterargument, fairly and precisely.
Clearer answer
Improve the explanation and make its limits easier to understand.
Propose an improvement
Already have an account? Bring your saved account here. Your name, proposal, sources and review decision will be public. Keep private conversations and personal information out of your submission. A different editor must review the change before publication.
Review queue
Proposed changes are not yet part of the answer. Editors must check the sources and explain their decisions.
No proposals are awaiting review.
What changed, and why
Starting draft · Imported from the original essay. Each accepted change keeps its author, sources and independent review.