Skip to content
Asha / Shared knowledge

religion · Shared topic · Revision 0

What is Frashokereti in Zoroastrianism?

What Is Frashokereti?

You are reading revision 0. Return to the current page. Erased or withdrawn contributions are excluded from historical views.
Starting explanation, not independently reviewed

The current answer

The end of the world as restoration, not extermination

What remains uncertain

This starting summary presents the original essay’s position. It has not received independent topic review. Its citations have been imported, not checked. Competing explanations and important objections may still be missing.

Show the work

Claims & evidence

Evidence labels are editorial judgments. Arena wins, votes and purchased items do not set them.

unreviewedseed-1

Frashokereti, the Zoroastrian end of the world, restores creation instead of destroying it: evil is burned out and the healed world is kept forever.

Imported citation, not independently checked: The Bundahishn

unreviewedseed-2

In the Bundahishn, the end-time river of molten metal purges the wicked of their wickedness, so every human being who ever lived comes out the far side.

Imported citation, not independently checked: The Bundahishn

unreviewedseed-3

Zoroastrianism treats matter as the good Lord's good creation, so its end of the world heals the body and the earth instead of escaping them.

Imported citation, not independently checked: M. Boyce, A History of Zoroastrianism (1975-1991)

unreviewedseed-4

The systematic Frashokereti doctrine survives in Pahlavi books written down around the ninth century CE, so dating it to 500 BCE is genuinely contested.

Imported citation, not independently checked: The Bundahishn; Y. S.-D. Vevaina, "Resurrecting the Resurrection" (2009)

unreviewedseed-5

Frashokereti as a systematized vision is late, but the hope of a final renovation is older, though thinner, and is already voiced in the Gathas.

Imported citation, not independently checked: The Gathas (Yasna 30)

unreviewedseed-6

The likeness between Frashokereti and the apokatastasis of Acts 3:21 is real resonance, but the late Zoroastrian sources forbid treating it as proven influence.

Imported citation, not independently checked: Acts 3:21; the Bundahishn

The strongest objections

These objections have passed editorial review for relevance. Their inclusion does not settle the disagreement.

No objection has been independently reviewed yet. This is a gap to investigate, not evidence that the answer is settled.

Earn credit by improving knowledge

Choose a useful challenge

Contributions are free. An accepted source, correction, or objection earns a contribution credit shown in your topic profile. Credit cannot buy influence over an answer.

Source scout

Find the original document. Point to the passage that supports or challenges a claim.

Strongest objection

Explain the best relevant counterargument, fairly and precisely.

Clearer answer

Improve the explanation and make its limits easier to understand.

Open the current revision to propose a change.

Review queue

Proposed changes are not yet part of the answer. Editors must check the sources and explain their decisions.

No proposals are awaiting review.

What changed, and why

Starting draft · Imported from the original essay. Each accepted change keeps its author, sources and independent review.

No editorial decisions have been recorded yet.