Skip to content
Asha / Shared knowledge

religion · Shared topic · Revision 0

Who Is Angra Mainyu (Ahriman)?

Who Is Angra Mainyu (Ahriman)?

You are reading revision 0. Return to the current page. Erased or withdrawn contributions are excluded from historical views.
Starting explanation, not independently reviewed

The current answer

The spirit who chose the Lie, and why he was never God's equal

What remains uncertain

This starting summary presents the original essay’s position. It has not received independent topic review. Its citations have been imported, not checked. Competing explanations and important objections may still be missing.

Show the work

Claims & evidence

Evidence labels are editorial judgments. Arena wins, votes and purchased items do not set them.

unreviewedseed-1

Angra Mainyu ("the Destructive Spirit," later Persian Ahriman) is the hostile mind of Zoroastrian thought, the source of the Lie, disease, and death.

Imported citation, not independently checked: Yasna 30:3-5; 45; Bundahishn

unreviewedseed-2

The oldest layer of Zoroastrian scripture (the Gathas, hymns attributed to Zarathushtra (Zoroaster) himself) names Angra Mainyu only sparingly, and never as Ahura Mazda's mirror-twin.

Imported citation, not independently checked: Gathas; A. de Jong, Traditions of the Magi (1997)

unreviewedseed-3

The decisive text is Yasna 30.3-5, which speaks of "two spirits" (mainyu) who, "in the beginning," chose: one chose life and truth, the other chose non-life and the Lie (Druj).

Imported citation, not independently checked: Yasna 30.3-5

unreviewedseed-4

Some priestly currents (the much-debated Zurvanism) even made Ohrmazd and Ahriman twin sons of Zurvan, primordial Time, which pushes the two toward genuine parity.

Imported citation, not independently checked: M. Boyce, Zoroastrians (1979); A. de Jong, Traditions of the Magi

The strongest objections

These objections have passed editorial review for relevance. Their inclusion does not settle the disagreement.

No objection has been independently reviewed yet. This is a gap to investigate, not evidence that the answer is settled.

Earn credit by improving knowledge

Choose a useful challenge

Contributions are free. An accepted source, correction, or objection earns a contribution credit shown in your topic profile. Credit cannot buy influence over an answer.

Source scout

Find the original document. Point to the passage that supports or challenges a claim.

Strongest objection

Explain the best relevant counterargument, fairly and precisely.

Clearer answer

Improve the explanation and make its limits easier to understand.

Open the current revision to propose a change.

Review queue

Proposed changes are not yet part of the answer. Editors must check the sources and explain their decisions.

No proposals are awaiting review.

What changed, and why

Starting draft · Imported from the original essay. Each accepted change keeps its author, sources and independent review.

No editorial decisions have been recorded yet.